Davide Lombardo

Where to find me

Dipartimento di Matematica
Università di Pisa
Email: davide.lombardo@unipi.it
Office: 328 (first floor)
Telephone number: +39 050 2213297

Who am I?

Hi! I'm an associate professor in Number Theory at the University of Pisa, Italy. Previously, I was a "junior researcher" at the same university (2017-2019), and before that I was a postdoc (2016-2017) in the Algebra and Number Theory group at the University of Hannover, supervised by Ulrich Derenthal. Even before that, I did my PhD at the University of Paris-Sud (also known as Orsay, and now Paris-Saclay) under the supervision of Nicolas Ratazzi.

Research interests

The main focus of my research is the arithmetic of abelian varieties and the study of their associated Galois representations (in the spirit of the Mumford-Tate and Sato-Tate conjectures). This comprises questions ranging from pure arithmetic geometry (can we find a good description of the effect of base change on the Néron model of a non-semistable abelian variety?) to computational problems (how does one determine the endomorphism ring of the Jacobian of a nice curve over the rationals?)

Some more specific questions

Below is a list of questions I would like to think about in the future. If you have ideas or comments about any of these, I'd love to hear them!

  • Generalised Kummer theory. Instead of considering $\ell^n$-torsion points of abelian varieties (or more generally commutative algebraic groups), one can consider $\ell^n$-division points of a fixed rational point $\alpha \in A(K)$. Many natural problems can be cast in this setting, and while the situation is well understood when $\dim A=1$ and the ground field is $\mathbb{Q}$, other cases seem to be much more mysterious.

  • Integral Galois theory. Let $L/K$ be a Galois extension of local or global fields with group $G$. What can be said about the structure of $\mathcal{O}_L$ as an $\mathcal{O}_K[G]$-module?

  • Groups of components of Sato-Tate groups. The Sato-Tate conjecture is in a sense a refinement of the Mumford-Tate conjecture; Serre has shown how to attach a certain algebraic group $\operatorname{ST}(A/K)$ to an Abelian variety $A$ over a number field $K$, and the group of components $\operatorname{ST}(A/K) / \operatorname{ST}(A/K)^0$ is thought to have significant arithmetical interest. There are many questions that can be asked about this object, for example: there are some 'obvious' constraints on which finite groups can be component groups of Sato-Tate groups over a given field $K$. Are these conditions sufficient?

  • Geometric realisation of endomorphisms of Jacobians. Every endomorphism of $\operatorname{Jac}(C)$, where $C$ is a smooth projective curve, can be represented by a divisor on $C \times C$. In some situations, these divisors have 'conceptual' interpretations, and I would like to (identify and) explore more of these cases.

  • Local-global principles for isogenies of abelian varieties.

  • Integral Lie theory. A wonderful result by Richard Pink gives a very handy description of the pro-$p$ subgroups of $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}_p)$ for $p>2$. I have managed to partially extend this to also cover the case $p=2$, but no similar result is available for algebraic groups other than $\operatorname{SL}_2$. Lazard's theory of Lie algebras should be relevant here, but work remains to be done.

  • The inverse problem for automorphism groups. Let $G$ be an algebraic group. Is there a projective variety $X$ with $\operatorname{Aut}(X) \cong G?$ We now know the answer when $G$ is an abelian variety, and I would love to understand whether certain linear algebraic groups are automorphism groups of smooth varieties or not.

  • Rational points of moduli stacks of curves. It is well known that elliptic curves over an algebraically closed field are classified by their $j$-invariant. Elliptic curves $E$ over a non-algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $\neq 2,3$ are classified by $j(E)$ together with the datum of a class in $K^\times/K^{\times d}$, where $d = \# \operatorname{Aut}(E_{\overline{K}})$. Can a similar description be found for genus 2 curves -- or, more interestingly, can one show that no such description exists (under suitable 'functoriality' assumptions)?